The Seventh-Grade Moral Compass

March 18, 2009

Subscribe Now!

Print Make PDF

Last week the Wall Street Journal shared about a recent Michigan State University study of seventh-graders looking at the connection between morality in real life and online.  In other words, what’s acceptable to a 12 or 13-year-old online and what’s acceptable in person? Here’s an excerpt from the article about the findings:

The study showed that greater Internet use correlates with a greater acceptance of “Internet harm,” which included threatening others over email and reading other people’s emails without asking. And overall, while the findings indicate that real-world morality hinted at how children view questionable online behavior, the relationship was weak, says Linda A. Jackson, a psychology professor at Michigan State and the principal investigator for the study.

That suggests that other factors are influencing online morality, she says. “There’s a disparity in the ways kids think about morality or virtue in the virtual world and the real world. There’s something else that goes on.”

What the “something else” is still isn’t clear. “We have to better understand how they conceptualize that world, whether they really think it is separate in some way.”

Moral reasoning in virtual reality begs a few different questions.  Some have to do with the type of world we are developing for ourselves and kids, wherein our online behaviors take a distinct shape that we sometimes surprisingly discover is inconsistent from our real-time behaviors.

Another set of questions might explore whether this phenomenon is really any different from adolescent culture in general.  Drawing from the constructs of our colleague Chap Clark, we could look at this as more evidence that kids operate out of a different sense of morality, safety, and self in the adolescent “world beneath” than when they are operating in the world of adults.

We’re probably also safe to say that a seventh-grader’s moral compass fluctuates quite a bit from day to day… and that one of the joys of youth ministry is that we get to come alongside them as they navigate decision-making along this crazy ride.

©2009 Fuller Youth Institute

Subscribe Now! Print Back to top
  • http://christopherbennett.blogspot.com C Brooks

    Great insights Brad. It would be great to hear Chap weigh in on this subject/post.

    -cb.

  • http://www.kchblog.com Kathy H

    I recently informed some parents that their 7th graders were joining Facebook hate groups against teachers and classmates. I had asked FB to remove them, but it took about 4 days for them to do so. Anyway, the parents I spoke to were all appalled and took appropriate action. The rest of the parents have no idea this ever happened.

    This is why I strongly encourage parents to try to stay a step ahead of their kids’ online activities, and to keep an open dialogue about what’s appropriate and what’s going on.

  • http://chapclark.blogspot.com/ chap clark

    I’ve been asked by Chris to respond to Brad’s blog on 7th graders, morality, and the web. Let me begin by affirming that Brad is sharp, and very smart. He is as solid a student of kids and culture as exists. I’m grateful for what he teaches me on blogs, in articles/books and in person.

    Okay, 7th graders, clearly early adolescents. My read of literature and my experience lead me to believe that we give far more credence to the cognitive (ie, “reasoning” and “moral compass”) capabilities of early adolescents. My view is that until the brain shifts to more abstract abilities (3rd person vs first person), they are culpable of “going with the flow” of what they are allowed to do and what others are in fact doing. To ask them to reflectively consider the outcome of their actions is, for the most part in an abstract setting, nonsense.

    Brad’s point about the compass “fluctuating,” then, is an important one. And I agree it is a vital time for youth workers to come alongside them. But, folks, YW are not nearly involved or invested enough, nor do we have the relational permission of the kid, to make too great a difference at this age and level. What we need to concentrate on with early adolescencts (ages 11-14/15) are two things: (1) demonstrate consistent and indivisible compassion and caring to each one, and (2) help parents to build sound boundaries, while still being kind, respectful and sensitive to their kids’ needs, that do not let them rip up the relational terrain as they seek to find a few friends and adults who will simply love them.

    That’s why we’ve given so much energy to our ParenTeen seminars and books/articles. I think this partnership is crucial, and so we bring in research-based speakers who are parents of teens themselves to help parents to see what today’s kids are going through today. Check it out: http://www.parenteen.com

    thanks, Brad… and Chris.

  • http://www.fulleryouthinstitute.org Brad Griffin

    chap, thanks for this post — really, really helpful clarifications and points for deeper conversation about this (as always!).

    i really appreciate your pointing back to parents here, and the reminder for us to keep humility about our own role in this process for early adolescents. sometimes we think way too much of ourselves and our abilities to significantly shape moral decision-making (and a lot of other things) over and above the influence of parents. that’s a good corrective.

Latest Blog Entry